Showing posts with label Magonia 75. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Magonia 75. Show all posts

Resisting Abduction: Ann Druffel Replies

Ann Druffel and 'The Pelican'
Magonia 75, July 2001
 
In Magonia issue 73 The Pelican wrote about my recent book, How to Defend Yourself Against Alien Abduction [1]. He also addressed a follow-up article in Flying Saucer Review in which I expressed my growing concern about the 'victim mentality' displayed by many so-called abductees [2]. Since certain top-profile abduction researchers in my own United States continue to ignore the subject of resistance techniques against 'alien abductors',

An Account of Experimental UFO Hoaxing

David Simpson and Ken Raine
Magonia 75, July 2001

It was interesting to read Magonia 74’s Editorial Notes about the 1970 Warminster photographic hoax, twenty five years after publication of 'Experimental UFO Hoaxing' in MUFOB New Series 2, and we thought that some background information, plus details of a couple of other UFO hoaxes might be of interest.
đź”»

UFO Hoaxing and the Story of Alex Birch

David Clarke and Andy Roberts
Magonia 75, July 2001

In 1962 Alex Birch was one year older than Stephen Darbishire had been when he took the photographs that changed his life. His single black and white picture has since entered the UFO mythology as one of the best-known photographic hoaxes – or was it? Alex’s family were considerably less financially well-off than the Darbishire’s; the Birch parents lived in a modest house at Mosborough, at that time in Derbyshire but actually on the outskirts of Sheffield.

UFO Hoaxing and the Story of Stephen Darbishire

David Clarke and Andy Roberts
Magonia 75, July 2001
 
Whenever ufologists turn their attention to the subject of hoaxing within their subject the fundamental gulf between sceptics and believers is brought sharply into focus. Those who choose to invest belief in the ETH and other exotic explanations for the UFO phenomenon tend towards the simplistic party line that, yes, hoaxes exist, but they are few and far between and have little effect on `serious ufology’. Sceptics and more open-minded students of flying saucery are a little more realistic.